A move that depended on the notice period
Mira had accepted a role described as remote and planned to move from Berlin to Leipzig. The draft addendum allowed the employer to require attendance at any site at short notice. During the review, we separated occasional project meetings from a regular return-to-office change and identified wording to discuss around notice, frequency and travel.
“The session was more exacting than I expected—we spent time pinning down the routine I had actually been promised. That felt slow at first, but it exposed the gap in the clause. My employer accepted a defined notice period and named Berlin as the only regular office.” — Mira, product designer
A policy that managers interpreted differently
A 24-person communications agency had one hybrid policy but three different team practices. The clinic mapped which decisions should apply to everyone and which could remain manager-led. The resulting decision record gave the agency a basis for revising office-day notice, equipment sign-out and exceptions for client work.
“Clara did not arrive with a generic policy. She kept asking who makes each decision and how an employee learns about it. We still had drafting to do afterwards, but the meeting gave us a stable set of choices.” — Jonas, agency director
An overseas stay that needed more than approval
Elena wanted to work from Portugal for six weeks while remaining employed in Germany. The screening did not offer a simple yes or no. It identified the facts needed for social-security and tax advice and showed that the employer’s remote-work policy only covered German addresses.
“I hoped for a quicker green light, so the number of follow-up questions was mildly frustrating. Still, it was much better to learn about the A1 and payroll questions before booking an apartment.” — Elena, account manager
A contract check before a first German role
“The explanation of probation, overtime and the post-contract restriction gave me a short list to raise with HR. I did not ask for every clause to change; I knew which two mattered for the way the role had been described.” — Samir, research associate
Client names and identifying details are used with permission or adjusted to protect confidentiality. Outcomes depend on the facts, the other party’s response and any specialist advice required.